mirror of
				https://github.com/saitohirga/WSJT-X.git
				synced 2025-10-31 04:50:34 -04:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			170 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C++
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			170 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			C++
		
	
	
	
	
	
| // find_root_example.cpp
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Copyright Paul A. Bristow 2007, 2010.
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Use, modification and distribution are subject to the
 | |
| // Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
 | |
| // (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt
 | |
| // or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Example of using root finding.
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Note that this file contains Quickbook mark-up as well as code
 | |
| // and comments, don't change any of the special comment mark-ups!
 | |
| 
 | |
| //[root_find1
 | |
| /*`
 | |
| First we need some includes to access the normal distribution
 | |
| (and some std output of course).
 | |
| */
 | |
| 
 | |
| #include <boost/math/tools/roots.hpp> // root finding.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #include <boost/math/distributions/normal.hpp> // for normal_distribution
 | |
|   using boost::math::normal; // typedef provides default type is double.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #include <iostream>
 | |
|   using std::cout; using std::endl; using std::left; using std::showpoint; using std::noshowpoint;
 | |
| #include <iomanip>
 | |
|   using std::setw; using std::setprecision;
 | |
| #include <limits>
 | |
|   using std::numeric_limits;
 | |
| #include <stdexcept>
 | |
|   
 | |
| 
 | |
| //] //[/root_find1]
 | |
| 
 | |
| int main()
 | |
| {
 | |
|   cout << "Example: Normal distribution, root finding.";
 | |
|   try
 | |
|   {
 | |
| 
 | |
| //[root_find2
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*`A machine is set to pack 3 kg of ground beef per pack.
 | |
| Over a long period of time it is found that the average packed was 3 kg
 | |
| with a standard deviation of 0.1 kg.
 | |
| Assuming the packing is normally distributed,
 | |
| we can find the fraction (or %) of packages that weigh more than 3.1 kg.
 | |
| */
 | |
| 
 | |
| double mean = 3.; // kg
 | |
| double standard_deviation = 0.1; // kg
 | |
| normal packs(mean, standard_deviation);
 | |
| 
 | |
| double max_weight = 3.1; // kg
 | |
| cout << "Percentage of packs > " << max_weight << " is "
 | |
| << cdf(complement(packs, max_weight)) << endl; // P(X > 3.1)
 | |
| 
 | |
| double under_weight = 2.9;
 | |
| cout <<"fraction of packs <= " << under_weight << " with a mean of " << mean
 | |
|   << " is " << cdf(complement(packs, under_weight)) << endl;
 | |
| // fraction of packs <= 2.9 with a mean of 3 is 0.841345
 | |
| // This is 0.84 - more than the target 0.95
 | |
| // Want 95% to be over this weight, so what should we set the mean weight to be?
 | |
| // KK StatCalc says:
 | |
| double over_mean = 3.0664;
 | |
| normal xpacks(over_mean, standard_deviation);
 | |
| cout << "fraction of packs >= " << under_weight
 | |
| << " with a mean of " << xpacks.mean()
 | |
|   << " is " << cdf(complement(xpacks, under_weight)) << endl;
 | |
| // fraction of packs >= 2.9 with a mean of 3.06449 is 0.950005
 | |
| double under_fraction = 0.05;  // so 95% are above the minimum weight mean - sd = 2.9
 | |
| double low_limit = standard_deviation;
 | |
| double offset = mean - low_limit - quantile(packs, under_fraction);
 | |
| double nominal_mean = mean + offset;
 | |
| 
 | |
| normal nominal_packs(nominal_mean, standard_deviation);
 | |
| cout << "Setting the packer to " << nominal_mean << " will mean that "
 | |
|   << "fraction of packs >= " << under_weight
 | |
|   << " is " << cdf(complement(nominal_packs, under_weight)) << endl;
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*`
 | |
| Setting the packer to 3.06449 will mean that fraction of packs >= 2.9 is 0.95.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Setting the packer to 3.13263 will mean that fraction of packs >= 2.9 is 0.99,
 | |
| but will more than double the mean loss from 0.0644 to 0.133.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Alternatively, we could invest in a better (more precise) packer with a lower standard deviation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To estimate how much better (how much smaller standard deviation) it would have to be,
 | |
| we need to get the 5% quantile to be located at the under_weight limit, 2.9
 | |
| */
 | |
| double p = 0.05; // wanted p th quantile.
 | |
| cout << "Quantile of " << p << " = " << quantile(packs, p)
 | |
|   << ", mean = " << packs.mean() << ", sd = " << packs.standard_deviation() << endl; //
 | |
| /*`
 | |
| Quantile of 0.05 = 2.83551, mean = 3, sd = 0.1
 | |
| 
 | |
| With the current packer (mean = 3, sd = 0.1), the 5% quantile is at 2.8551 kg,
 | |
| a little below our target of 2.9 kg.
 | |
| So we know that the standard deviation is going to have to be smaller.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Let's start by guessing that it (now 0.1) needs to be halved, to a standard deviation of 0.05
 | |
| */
 | |
| normal pack05(mean, 0.05);
 | |
| cout << "Quantile of " << p << " = " << quantile(pack05, p)
 | |
|   << ", mean = " << pack05.mean() << ", sd = " << pack05.standard_deviation() << endl;
 | |
| 
 | |
| cout <<"Fraction of packs >= " << under_weight << " with a mean of " << mean
 | |
|   << " and standard deviation of " << pack05.standard_deviation()
 | |
|   << " is " << cdf(complement(pack05, under_weight)) << endl;
 | |
| //
 | |
| /*`
 | |
| Fraction of packs >= 2.9 with a mean of 3 and standard deviation of 0.05 is 0.9772
 | |
| 
 | |
| So 0.05 was quite a good guess, but we are a little over the 2.9 target,
 | |
| so the standard deviation could be a tiny bit more. So we could do some
 | |
| more guessing to get closer, say by increasing to 0.06
 | |
| */
 | |
| 
 | |
| normal pack06(mean, 0.06);
 | |
| cout << "Quantile of " << p << " = " << quantile(pack06, p)
 | |
|   << ", mean = " << pack06.mean() << ", sd = " << pack06.standard_deviation() << endl;
 | |
| 
 | |
| cout <<"Fraction of packs >= " << under_weight << " with a mean of " << mean
 | |
|   << " and standard deviation of " << pack06.standard_deviation()
 | |
|   << " is " << cdf(complement(pack06, under_weight)) << endl;
 | |
| /*`
 | |
| Fraction of packs >= 2.9 with a mean of 3 and standard deviation of 0.06 is 0.9522
 | |
| 
 | |
| Now we are getting really close, but to do the job properly,
 | |
| we could use root finding method, for example the tools provided, and used elsewhere,
 | |
| in the Math Toolkit, see __root_finding_without_derivatives.
 | |
| 
 | |
| But in this normal distribution case, we could be even smarter and make a direct calculation.
 | |
| */
 | |
| //] [/root_find2]
 | |
| 
 | |
|   }
 | |
|   catch(const std::exception& e)
 | |
|   { // Always useful to include try & catch blocks because default policies
 | |
|     // are to throw exceptions on arguments that cause errors like underflow, overflow.
 | |
|     // Lacking try & catch blocks, the program will abort without a message below,
 | |
|     // which may give some helpful clues as to the cause of the exception.
 | |
|     std::cout <<
 | |
|       "\n""Message from thrown exception was:\n   " << e.what() << std::endl;
 | |
|   }
 | |
|   return 0;
 | |
| }  // int main()
 | |
| 
 | |
| /*
 | |
| Output is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| //[root_find_output
 | |
| 
 | |
| Autorun "i:\boost-06-05-03-1300\libs\math\test\Math_test\debug\find_root_example.exe"
 | |
| Example: Normal distribution, root finding.Percentage of packs > 3.1 is 0.158655
 | |
| fraction of packs <= 2.9 with a mean of 3 is 0.841345
 | |
| fraction of packs >= 2.9 with a mean of 3.0664 is 0.951944
 | |
| Setting the packer to 3.06449 will mean that fraction of packs >= 2.9 is 0.95
 | |
| Quantile of 0.05 = 2.83551, mean = 3, sd = 0.1
 | |
| Quantile of 0.05 = 2.91776, mean = 3, sd = 0.05
 | |
| Fraction of packs >= 2.9 with a mean of 3 and standard deviation of 0.05 is 0.97725
 | |
| Quantile of 0.05 = 2.90131, mean = 3, sd = 0.06
 | |
| Fraction of packs >= 2.9 with a mean of 3 and standard deviation of 0.06 is 0.95221
 | |
| 
 | |
| //] [/root_find_output]
 | |
| */
 |